Towards Unification of Discourse Annotation Frameworks

3Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Discourse information is difficult to represent and annotate. Among the major frameworks for annotating discourse information, RST, PDTB and SDRT are widely discussed and used, each having its own theoretical foundation and focus. Corpora annotated under different frameworks vary considerably. To make better use of the existing discourse corpora and achieve the possible synergy of different frameworks, it is worthwhile to investigate the systematic relations between different frameworks and devise methods of unifying the frameworks. Although the issue of framework unification has been a topic of discussion for a long time, there is currently no comprehensive approach which considers unifying both discourse structure and discourse relations and evaluates the unified framework intrinsically and extrinsically. We plan to use automatic means for the unification task and evaluate the result with structural complexity and downstream tasks. We will also explore the application of the unified framework in multi-task learning and graphical models.

References Powered by Scopus

Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization

2535Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modeling local coherence: An entity-based approach

443Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Discourse-aware neural extractive text summarization

214Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Diversify Question Generation with Retrieval-Augmented Style Transfer

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

WebDP: Understanding Discourse Structures in Semi-Structured Web Documents

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fu, Y. (2022). Towards Unification of Discourse Annotation Frameworks. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 132–142). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-srw.12

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 13

68%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 10

45%

Social Sciences 9

41%

Linguistics 2

9%

Neuroscience 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0