Comparison of typing methods for Clostridium difficile isolates

9Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A simple discriminative typing method for Clostridium difficile has been developed. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of whole-cell proteins and restriction enzyme analysis are relatively simple techniques but are difficult to evaluate, especially the restriction enzyme analysis. Immunoblotting and restriction fragment length polymorphism typing facilitate simple discrimination of patterns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wolfhagen, M. J. H. M., Fluit, A. C., Torensma, R., Jansze, M., Kuypers, A. F. A., Verhage, E. A. E., & Verhoef, J. (1993). Comparison of typing methods for Clostridium difficile isolates. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.31.8.2208-2211.1993

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free