Whanau Awhina Plunket nurses' views on the use of the PHQ-3 postnatal depression screening tool: A survey

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: In New Zealand, nurses visiting families postnatally use the Patient Health Questionnaire-3 (PHQ-3) to screen and detect postnatal depression. Exploring nurses' perception of the tool when using it with women across cultures is central to ensuring the PHQ-3 tool supports equitable screening and detection of postnatal depression, yet little is known about nurses' confidence with, and use of, the tool with people of differing cultures. Aim: The aim of this study was to understand nurses' confidence in using the PHQ-3 to screen for postnatal depression, particularly its use cross-culturally. Methods: Quantitative online survey research was carried out in 2019. Fifty-Two percent of eligible registered nurses participated (n = 187), completing Likert scale responses and open questions about the use of the screening tool with specific groups, and barriers and facilitators to screening. Results: Ninety-five percent of participants were confident in their use of the PQH-3, 70% of nurses agreed the PHQ-3 supports the identification of postnatal depression, and most respondents (54.5%) disagreed that the PHQ-3 was a good screening tool cross-culturally. Discussion: Nurses were confident in their use of the PHQ-3, and it was relatively highly regarded in its ability to detect postnatal depression. However, less confidence in its use across cultures implies the PHQ-3 does not translate to evidence-based, cross-cultural care. To serve culturally diverse populations, consultation is needed on both languages used and cultural practices so that tools are appropriate, otherwise they cannot be validated for use cross-culturally.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faulkner, J., & MoirB, C. (2023). Whanau Awhina Plunket nurses’ views on the use of the PHQ-3 postnatal depression screening tool: A survey. Journal of Primary Health Care, 15(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1071/HC22120

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free