Why bother learning about learning styles and psychological types?

6Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that increased learning gains can be achieved with adult learners when instruction is designed with learning styles in mind 1-3. The adoption of any type of new teaching and/or learning approach has the potential to require a good deal of valuable faculty time and energy. In this paper, the question of why science and engineering faculty should learn about learning styles and psychological types will be addressed. A brief overview of two learning style models and assessment instruments will be presented. These learning style models are: The Dunn and Dunn Model and the Kolb Model. These models will be compared and contrasted in terms of their usefulness and application both inside and outside of the classroom. A comparison will also be made between these learning style models and one well-known application that has been developed to assess psychological type. To this end, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) will be described.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Larkin-Hein, T., & Budny, D. D. (2000). Why bother learning about learning styles and psychological types? In ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 6911–6928). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--8851

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free