Comparative evaluation of regression methods for 3D-2D image registration

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We perform a comparative evaluation of different regression techniques for 3D-2D registration-by-regression. In registration-by-regression, image registration is treated as a nonlinear regression problem that relates image features of 2D projection images to the transformation parameters of the 3D image. In this work, we evaluate seven regression methods: Multiple Linear and Polynomial Regression (LR and PR), k-Nearest Neighbour (k-NN), Multiple Layer Perceptron with conjugate gradient optimization (MLP-CG) and with Levenberg-Marquardt optimization (MLP-LM), Radial Basis Function network (RBF) and Support Vector Regression (SVR). The experiments are performed using simulated X-ray images (DRRs) of nine coronary vessel trees, allowing us to compute the mean target registration error (mTRE) to the ground truth. All methods were robust to large initial misalignment and the highest accuracy was achieved using MLP-LM and RBF. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gouveia, A. I. R., Metz, C., Freire, L., & Klein, S. (2012). Comparative evaluation of regression methods for 3D-2D image registration. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7553 LNCS, pp. 238–245). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33266-1_30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free