Conclusion: An attempt to describe the state of habitat and species modeling today

17Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We set out to deliver a book that would prompt increased attention to the ecological theory and assess the relevant assumptions that underlie predictive landscape-scale species and habitat modeling. We invited international authors who are actively engaged in advancing the discipline of predictive modeling in landscape ecology to provide chapters that would not only highlight current developments and identify outstanding gaps, but which would also reflect on how methodological choices were informed by ecological theory. In this manner, we have provided readers not with a how- to guide that will rapidly become outdated as methods advance, but rather insights into the thought processes, reasoning, and current debates that are common across modeling projects and methods. Such extended reflections help to show multiple viewpoints and stimulate new ideas; they rarely find space in published research manuscripts. However, we believe these will offer valuable guidance to both novice and advanced modelers seeking to discern trade-offs between alternative modeling approaches. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Drew, C. A., Wiersma, Y. F., & Huettmann, F. (2011). Conclusion: An attempt to describe the state of habitat and species modeling today. In Predictive Species and Habitat Modeling in Landscape Ecology: Concepts and Applications (pp. 291–298). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7390-0_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free