Objective assessment for open surgical suturing training by finger tracking can discriminate novices from experts

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is difficult, time consuming and expensive to assess manual skills in open surgery. The aim of this study is to investigate the construct validity of a low-cost, easily accessible tracking technique for basic open suturing tasks. Medical master students, surgical residents, and surgeons at the Radboud University Medical Center were recruited between September 2020 until September 2021. The participants were divided, according to experience, in a novice group (≤10 sutures performed) and an expert group (>50 sutures performed). For objective tracking, a tablet with SurgTrac software was used, which tracked a blue and a red tag placed on respectively their left and right index finger. The participants executed four basic tasks on a suturing model: 1) knot tying by hand, 2) transcutaneous suturing with an instrument knot, 3) ‘Donati’ (vertical mattress suture) with an instrument knot and 4) continuous intracutaneous suturing without a knot. In total 76 participants were included: 57 novices and 19 experts. All four tasks showed significant differences between the novice group and expert group for the parameters time (p<0.001), distance (p<0.001 for Task 1, 2 and 3 and p=0.034 for Task 4) and smoothness (p<0.001). Additionally, Task 3 showed a significant difference for the parameter handedness (p=0.006) and Task 4 for speed (p=0.033). Tracking index finger movements using SurgTrac software on a tablet while executing basic open suturing skills on a simulator shows excellent construct validity for time, distance and motion smoothness in all four suturing tasks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hillemans, V., van de Mortel, X., Buyne, O., Verhoeven, B. H., & Botden, S. M. B. I. (2023). Objective assessment for open surgical suturing training by finger tracking can discriminate novices from experts. Medical Education Online, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2198818

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free