Aligning ontologies and evaluating concept similarities

38Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

An innate characteristic of the development of ontologies is that they are often created by independent groups of expertise, which generates the necessity of merging and aligning ontologies covering overlapping domains. However, a central issue in the merging process is the evaluation of the differences between two ontologies, viz. the establishment of a similarity measure between their concepts. Many algorithms and tools have been proposed for merging of ontologies, but the majority of them disregard the structural properties of the source ontologies, focusing mostly on syntactic analysis. This article focuses on the alignment of ontologies through Formal Concept Analysis, a data analysis technique founded on lattice theory, and on the use of similarity measures to identify cross-ontology related concepts. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Souza, K. X. S., & Davis, J. (2004). Aligning ontologies and evaluating concept similarities. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3291, 1012–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30469-2_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free