An attempt was made to distinguish between the dual-access and the activation and synthesis models of word identification. Word regularity and consistency were factorially manipulated. In two experiments lexical decisions were required, and in two the task was word naming. Within each task, comparisons were made of the effects achieved by manipulating the degree to which subjects were free to rely on a phonological, rather than a visual, stimulus code. The results suggested that lexical access generally involves the activation of lexical entries that are visually similar to the target, but that subjects do favor a phonological code when the task requires the naming of words only. The data were interpreted as requiring a model incorporating elements of both the dual-access and the activation and synthesis frameworks. © 1982 Psychonomic Society, Inc.
CITATION STYLE
Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory & Cognition, 10(6), 565–575. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202439
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.