Not just an empty threat: Subgame-perfect equilibrium in repeated games played by computationally bounded players

4Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We study the problem of finding a subgame-perfect equilibrium in repeated games. In earlier work [Halpern, Pass and Seeman 2014], we showed how to efficiently find an (approximate) Nash equilibrium if assuming that players are computationally bounded (and making standard cryptographic hardness assumptions); in contrast, as demonstrated in the work of Borgs et al. [2010], unless we restrict to computationally bounded players, the problem is PPAD-hard. But it is well-known that for extensive-form games (such as repeated games), Nash equilibrium is a weak solution concept. In this work, we define and study an appropriate notion of a subgame-perfect equilibrium for computationally bounded players, and show how to efficiently find such an equilibrium in repeated games (again, making standard cryptographic hardness assumptions). As we show in the full paper, our algorithm works not only for games with a finite number of players, but also for constant-degree graphical games.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Halpern, J. Y., Pass, R., & Seeman, L. (2014). Not just an empty threat: Subgame-perfect equilibrium in repeated games played by computationally bounded players. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8877, 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13129-0_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free