Compared with feeding infants breast milk or cow-milk formula, soy formula feeding does not affect subsequent reproductive organ size at 5 years of age

32Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Literature reports suggest that phytochemicals, such as isoflavones found in soybeans, impair reproductive function in animals and raise the possibility that consuming soy infant formula could alter hormonally sensitive organ development in children. Objective: This study compared reproductive organs volumes and structural characteristics in children at age 5y who were enrolled in the Beginnings study long-term cohort. Methods: Breast bud, uterus, ovaries, prostate, and testes volumes and characteristics were assessed by ultrasonography in 101 children (50 boys and 51 girls) aged 5y who were breastfed (n = 35) or fed cow-milk formula (n = 32) or soy formula (n = 34) as infants. Analyses were adjusted for race, gestational age, and birth weight. Results: Among girls, no significant differenceswere found in breast bud, ovarian, or uterine volumes; counts of ovarieswith cysts; ovarian cysts numbers; ovarian cyst size; and uterine shape between the diet groups. Among boys, no significant differences were found in breast bud, testes, or prostate volumes or structural characteristics between the diet groups. Conclusions: In this cohort, no early infant feeding effects were found on reproductive organs volumes and structural characteristics in children age 5y. The follow-up of these children through puberty is planned and should help delineate potential early infant feeding effect on reproductive function later in life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andres, A., Moore, M. B., Linam, L. E., Casey, P. H., Cleves, M. A., & Badger, T. M. (2015). Compared with feeding infants breast milk or cow-milk formula, soy formula feeding does not affect subsequent reproductive organ size at 5 years of age. Journal of Nutrition, 145(5), 871–875. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.114.206201

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free