Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of low- and high- spatial-resolution dynamic MR images

13Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare the diagnostic performance of low- and high-spatial-resolution gadolinium chelate-enhanced triphasic dynamic gradient-recalled echo (GRE) MR images in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Triphasic dynamic MR images obtained with low (256 x 128) and high (512 x 224) image matrices in 28 patients with 65 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) were retrospectively analyzed. Image review was conducted on a segment-by-segment basis; a total of 215 liver segments, including 56 segments with tumor burden, were reviewed for the presence of HCC by three independent radiologists. Detectability was evaluated with relative sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Image quality was evaluated with rank order analysis. RESULTS. Relative sensitivity was statistically significantly better with high-spatial-resolution images than with low-spatial-resolution images (p < .005). Relative specificity was statistically significantly better with low-spatial-resolution images than with high-spatial-resolution images (p < .001). Diagnostic accuracy determined by ROC curve analysis was marginally higher with high-spatial-resolution (area under ROC curve [A(z)] = .97) than with low-spatial-resolution (A(z) = .94, p < .09) images. Image quality was statistically significantly better with high-spatial-resolution images (p < .005). CONCLUSION. High-spatial-resolution dynamic GRE images were superior to low-spatial-resolution images in sensitivity of detecting HCC and in image quality. Triphasic dynamic GRE imaging in the screening and follow-up programs of patients with suspected HCC should be performed using high image matrices.

References Powered by Scopus

The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

17820Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Special articles roc methodology in radiologic imaging

1572Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies

856Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Magnetic resonance imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnostic imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis before liver transplantation

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MR imaging of the liver using gadolinium chelates

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kanematsu, M., Hoshi, H., Murakami, T., Itoh, K., Hori, M., Kondo, H., & Nakamura, H. (1999). Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of low- and high- spatial-resolution dynamic MR images. American Journal of Roentgenology, 173(5), 1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.173.5.10541090

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free