Using smartphone sensor data to assess inhibitory control in the wild: Longitudinal study

7Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Inhibitory control, or inhibition, is one of the core executive functions of humans. It contributes to our attention, performance, and physical and mental well-being. Our inhibitory control is modulated by various factors and therefore fluctuates over time. Being able to continuously and unobtrusively assess our inhibitory control and understand the mediating factors may allow us to design intelligent systems that help manage our inhibitory control and ultimately our well-being. Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate whether we can assess individuals' inhibitory control using an unobtrusive and scalable approach to identify digital markers that are predictive of changes in inhibitory control. Methods: We developed InhibiSense, an app that passively collects the following information: users' behaviors based on their phone use and sensor data, the ground truths of their inhibition control measured with stop-signal tasks (SSTs) and ecological momentary assessments (EMAs), and heart rate information transmitted from a wearable heart rate monitor (Polar H10). We conducted a 4-week in-the-wild study, where participants were asked to install InhibiSense on their phone and wear a Polar H10. We used generalized estimating equation (GEE) and gradient boosting tree models fitted with features extracted from participants' phone use and sensor data to predict their stop-signal reaction time (SSRT), an objective metric used to measure an individual's inhibitory control, and identify the predictive digital markers. Results: A total of 12 participants completed the study, and 2189 EMAs and SST responses were collected. The results from the GEE models suggest that the top digital markers positively associated with an individual's SSRT include phone use burstiness (P=.005), the mean duration between 2 consecutive phone use sessions (P=.02), the change rate of battery level when the phone was not charged (P=.04), and the frequency of incoming calls (P=.03). The top digital markers negatively associated with SSRT include the standard deviation of acceleration (P

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tseng, V. W. S., Dos Reis Costa, J., Jung, M. F., & Choudhury, T. (2020). Using smartphone sensor data to assess inhibitory control in the wild: Longitudinal study. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.2196/21703

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free