Adding Fuel to the Collective Fire: Stereotype Threat, Solidarity, and Support for Change

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We hypothesize a yet-unstudied effect of experiencing systemic stereotype threat on women’s collective action efforts: igniting women’s support for other women and motivation to improve organizational gender balance. Hypotheses are supported in two surveys (Study 1: N = 1,365 business school alumnae; Study 2: N = 386 women Master of Business Administration [MBA]), and four experiments (Studies 3–6; total N = 1,897 working women). Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that experiencing stereotype threat is negatively associated with women’s domain-relevant engagement (supporting extant work on the negative effects of stereotype threat), but positively associated with women’s support and advocacy of gender balance. Studies 3 to 6 provide causal evidence that stereotype threat activation leads to greater attitudes and intentions to support gender balance, ruling out negative affect as an alternative explanation and identifying ingroup solidarity as a mechanism. We discuss implications for working women, women leaders, and organizations striving to empower their entire workforce through developing equitable and inclusive practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cortland, C. I., & Kinias, Z. (2023). Adding Fuel to the Collective Fire: Stereotype Threat, Solidarity, and Support for Change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231202630

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free