Radiologic technologist and radiologist knowledge gaps about breast density revealed by an online continuing education course

3Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: We sought to identify provider knowledge gaps and their predictors, as revealed by a breast density continuing education course marketed to the radiology community. Methods: The course, continually available online during the study period of November 2, 2016 and December 31, 2018, includes demographics collection; a monograph on breast density, breast cancer risk, and screening; and a post-test. Four post-test questions were modified during the study period, resulting in different sample sizes pre- and postmodification. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors of knowledge gaps (defined as > 25% of responses incorrect). Results: Of 1649 analyzable registrants, 1363 (82.7%) were radiologic technologists, 226 (13.7%) were physicians, and 60 (3.6%) were other nonphysicians; over 90% of physicians and over 90% of technologists/nonphysicians specialized in radiology. Sixteen of 49 physicians (32.7%) and 80/233 (34.3%) technologists/nonphysicians mistakenly thought the Gail model should be used to determine “high-risk” status for recommending MRI or genetic testing. Ninety-nine of 226 (43.8%) physicians and 682/1423 (47.9%) technologists/nonphysicians misunderstood the inverse relationship between increasing age and lifetime breast cancer risk. Fifty-two of 166 (31.3%) physicians and 549/1151 (47.7%) technologists/nonphysicians were unaware that MRI should be recommended for women with a family history of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations.Tomosynthesis effectiveness was overestimated, with 18/60 (30.0%) physicians and 95/272 (34.9%) technologists/nonphysicians believing sensitivity nearly equaled MRI. Knowledge gaps were more common in technologists/nonphysicians. Conclusions: Important knowledge gaps about breast density, breast cancer risk assessment, and screening exist among radiologic technologists and radiologists. Continued education efforts may improve appropriate breast cancer screening recommendations.

References Powered by Scopus

Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: Report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study

5017Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually

2821Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography

2291Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effect of an Educational Intervention on Women's Health Care Provider Knowledge Gaps about Breast Cancer Risk Model Use and High-risk Screening Recommendations

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mammography, Breast Density, and Major Adverse Cardiac Events: Potential Buy-One-Get-One-Free Lifesaving Bonus Finding

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysing Student Feedback on the Integration of 3D Printing in the Teaching of Mammography for Radiologic Technologists

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seitzman, R. L., Pushkin, J. A., & Berg, W. A. (2020). Radiologic technologist and radiologist knowledge gaps about breast density revealed by an online continuing education course. Journal of Breast Imaging, 2(4), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaa039

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 9

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free