The significance of wild birds (Larus sp.) in the epidemiology of campylobacter infections in humans

41Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

During much of the present century, the population of herring gulls in Britain has increased rapidly (Cramp, Bourne & Saunders, 1973; Chabrzyk & Coulson, 1976; Monaghan & Coulson, 1977). Accompanying this changes was an increased utilization by these birds of human waste as a food supply, particularly sewage and refuse emanating from our towns and cities (Monaghan, 1983; Horton et al. 1983). This, coupled with their habits of roosting on agricultural land and water storage reservoirs and of breeding on inhabited buildings, has given rise to concern over the role of these birds in the spread of disease to man and domestic animals (e.g. Fenlon, 1981; Reilly et al. 1981; Butterfield et al. 1983; Monaghan et al. 1985; Girdwood et al. 1986). © 1988, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Whelan, C. D., Monaghan, P., Girdwood, R. W. A., & Fricker, C. R. (1988). The significance of wild birds (Larus sp.) in the epidemiology of campylobacter infections in humans. Epidemiology and Infection, 101(2), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268800054170

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free