Evaluation of enterolert for enumeration of enterococci in recreational waters

66Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Enterolert (IDEXX Laboratories Inc., Westbrook, Maine), a semiautomated, most probable number method for enumeration of enterococci, was compared with the standard membrane filter method by parallel testing of 138 marine and freshwater recreational bathing water samples. No statistically significant difference and a strong linear correlation were found between methods. Culturing of 501 Enterolert test wells resulted in false-positive and false- negative rates of 5.1 and 0.4%, respectively. Less time for setup, incubation (24 versus 48 h), and reading of Enterolert permits more efficient monitoring of recreational bathing areas.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Enterococci in the environment

543Citations
839Readers

This article is free to access.

178Citations
193Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Budnick, G. E., Howard, R. T., & Mayo, D. R. (1996). Evaluation of enterolert for enumeration of enterococci in recreational waters. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 62(10), 3881–3884. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.62.10.3881-3884.1996

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

57%

Researcher 20

41%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20

38%

Environmental Science 17

32%

Engineering 10

19%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0