ASSESSMENT OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND EFFICIENCY OF BANK BRANCHES USING NETWORK DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficiency of bank branches by using the data envelopment analysis models (DEA) in three stages, the effect of risk on the efficiency. This study used BCC and CCR indicators. The data used is related to 30 bank branches in 2020. The most crucial goal was simultaneously testing risk and efficiency in three stages. Results showed that in the case of CCR with risk-taking, 17 practical branches with a performance score of 100, and the rest were inefficient. The average risk-taking efficiency is also 0.9. The risk-based BCC model has also been used, with 19 branches with a performance score of 100 and the remainder inefficient. The efficiency of the branches using the CCR model includes 10 efficient branches, and the remaining branches are unproductive. By implementing the BCC model, efficient branches have 13 effective branches, and the remaining inefficiencies that have been effective after applying the risk factor in the second model, are Roodsar Branches and Imam and Chaboksar Blvd. Comparative analysis can help managers recognise where improvement should be prioritised, and inefficient branches become efficient in an operational plan.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring the efficiency of decision making units

22148Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS.

11773Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis

336Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Azizi, J., Huseynov, R., & Li, M. (2023). ASSESSMENT OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND EFFICIENCY OF BANK BRANCHES USING NETWORK DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 12(4 Special Issue), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i4siart1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

25%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

25%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free