Do bedroom screens and the mealtime environment shape different trajectories of child overweight and obesity? Research using the Growing Up in Scotland study

10Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate how mealtime setting, mealtime interaction and bedroom screens are associated with different trajectories of child overweight and obesity, using a population sample. Methods: Growth mixture modelling used data from children in the Growing Up in Scotland Study born in 2004/5 (boys n = 2085, girls n = 1991) to identify trajectories of overweight or obesity across four time points, from 46 to 122 months. Using data from children present at all sweeps, and combining sexes (n = 2810), mutually adjusted associations between primary exposures (mealtime setting, mealtime interaction and bedroom screens) and trajectory class were explored in multinomial models; controlling for early life factors, household organisation and routines, and children’s diet patterns, overall screen use, physical activity and sleep. Results: Five trajectories were identified in both sexes: Low Risk (68% of sample), Decreasing Overweight (9%), Increasing Overweight (12%), High/Stable Overweight (6%) and High/Increasing Obesity (5%). Compared with the Low Risk trajectory, High/Increasing Obesity and High/Stable Overweight trajectories were characterised by early increases in bedroom screen access (respective relative risk ratios (RRR) and 95% confidence intervals: 2.55 [1.30–5.00]; 1.62 [1.01–2.57]). An informal meal setting (involving mealtime screen use, not eating in a dining area and not sitting at a table) characterised the High/Increasing Obesity and Increasing Overweight trajectories (respective RRRs compared with Low Risk trajectory: 3.67 [1.99–6.77]; 1.75 [1.17–2.62]). Positive mealtime interaction was associated with membership of the Increasing Overweight trajectory (RRR 1.64 [1.13–2.36]). Conclusion: Bedroom screen access and informal mealtime environments were associated with higher-risk overweight and obesity trajectories in a representative sample of Scottish children, after adjusting for a wide range of confounders. Findings may challenge the notion that positive mealtime interaction is protective. Promoting mealtimes in a screen-free dining area and removing screens from bedrooms may help combat childhood obesity.

References Powered by Scopus

The short-form version of the Depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample

4078Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bringing order out of chaos: Psychometric characteristics of the confusion, hubbub, and order scale

732Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Longitudinal impact of sleep on overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and bias-adjusted meta-analysis

453Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The evolving family mealtime: Findings from focus group interviews with hispanic mothers

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physical activity, screen time, and sleep trajectories from childhood to adolescence: The influence of sex and body weight status

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impacts of kitchen and dining spatial design on cooking and eating experience in residential buildings: a scoping review

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parkes, A., Green, M., & Pearce, A. (2020). Do bedroom screens and the mealtime environment shape different trajectories of child overweight and obesity? Research using the Growing Up in Scotland study. International Journal of Obesity, 44(4), 790–802. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-019-0502-1

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

64%

Researcher 8

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 11

41%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

30%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

15%

Sports and Recreations 4

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0