The optimal neoadjuvant regimen for nonsmall cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and complications of different neoadjuvant to determine the optimal regimens for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Methods: A systematic search of the Web of Science, and PubMed databases was conducted through June 3, 2021, reporting a comparison of chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Results: Of 3462 studies, 25 were considered for evidence synthesis. 1035 patients who received chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery did not prolong the overall survival (OS) compared with 1038 patients who received surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% CI 1·00-1·28, P = 0·05). 1192 patients received chemoradiotherapy and 864 patients received chemotherapy or radiotherapy; chemoradiotherapy prolonged the OS compared with chemotherapy (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0·29 to 0.95, P =.03). Compared with 110 patients who received other therapy, 93 patients who received immunotherapy had prolonged the OS (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1·08-2·25, P =.02). Chemoradiotherapy increased the pathological response rate (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1·33-2·12, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, Y., Zhao, C., Lu, Q., & Hu, Y. (2022). The optimal neoadjuvant regimen for nonsmall cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Medicine (United States), 101(34), E30159. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030159

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free