An experimental study on short-term changes in the anaerobic oxidation of methane in response to varying methane and sulfate fluxes

27Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A major role in regulation of global methane fluxes has been attributed to the process of anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM), which is performed by consortia of methanotrophic archaea and sulfate reducing bacteria. An important question remains how these energy limited, slow growing microorganisms with generation times of 3-7months respond to rapid natural variations in methane fluxes at cold seeps. We used an experimental flow-through column system filled with cold seep sediments naturally enriched in methanotrophic communities, to test their responses to short-term variations in methane and sulfate fluxes. At stable methane and sulfate concentrations of ~2mMand 28mM, respectively, wemeasured constant rates of AOM and sulfate reduction (SR) for up to 160 days of incubation. When percolated with methane-free medium, the anaerobic methanotrophs ceased to produce sulfide. After a starvation phase of 40 days, the addition of methane restored former AOM and SR rates immediately. At methane concentrations between 0-2.3mM we measured a linear correlation between methane availability, AOMand SR. At constant fluid flow velocities of 30myr -1, ca. 50% of the methane was consumed by the anaerobic methanotrophic (ANME) population at all concentrations tested. Reducing the sulfate concentration from 28 to 1mM, a decrease in AOM and SR by 50% was observed, and 45% of the methane was consumed. Hence, the marine anaerobic methanotrophs (ANME) are capable of oxidizing substantial amounts of methane over a wide and variable range of fluxes of the reaction educts. © Author(s) 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wegener, G., & Boetius, A. (2009). An experimental study on short-term changes in the anaerobic oxidation of methane in response to varying methane and sulfate fluxes. Biogeosciences, 6(5), 867–876. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-867-2009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free