Does Pooling Really Matter? An Evaluation on Gait Recognition

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Most Convolutional Neural Networks make use of subsampling layers to reduce dimensionality and keep only the most essential information, besides turning the model more robust to rotation and translation variations. One of the most common sampling methods is the one who keeps only the maximum value in a given region, known as max-pooling. In this study, we provide pieces of evidence that, by removing this subsampling layer and changing the stride of the convolution layer, one can obtain comparable results but much faster. Results on the gait recognition task show the robustness of the proposed approach, as well as its statistical similarity to other pooling methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

dos Santos, C. F. G., Moreira, T. P., Colombo, D., & Papa, J. P. (2019). Does Pooling Really Matter? An Evaluation on Gait Recognition. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 11896 LNCS, pp. 751–760). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33904-3_71

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free