Pembuktian Perdata dalam Kasus Malpraktik di Yogyakarta

  • Aristya S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The research on civil law evidence on malpractice cases in Yogyakarta was conducted through field and literature studies. The conclusion is that civil law evidence in malpractice case which happened in Yogyakarta is subjected to the civil law procedure. However, the special character of the case creates some deviation on the procedures. Penelitian tentang pembuktian perdata dalam kasus malpraktik di Yogyakarta dilakukan melalui studi lapangan dan studi pustaka. Kesimpulan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pembuktian perdata dalam kasus malpraktik di Yogyakarta masih menggunakan prosedur hukum acara perdata yang berlaku positif. Namun, karakter khusus dari kasus ini menyebabkan beberapa penyimpangan prosedur.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aristya, S. D. F. (2012). Pembuktian Perdata dalam Kasus Malpraktik di Yogyakarta. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 180. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16166

Readers over time

‘16‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

31%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 12

57%

Social Sciences 5

24%

Computer Science 2

10%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0