Circularizing PET-G Multimaterials: Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The recycling of multimaterials such as payment or access cards poses significant challenges. Building on previous experimental work demonstrating the feasibility of chemically recyclable payment cards made from glycol-modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET-G), we use life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis to investigate two chemical recycling scenarios and evaluate their potential environmental and economic benefits. Recovering all components from the depolymerized products (Scenario 1) achieves substantial environmental benefits across most categories, reducing global warming by up to 67% compared to only recovering major components (Scenario 2). However, the environmental benefits in Scenario 1 incur 69% higher total annualized costs, causing its profitability to be dependent on a minimum selling price of £13.4/kg for cyclohexanedimethanol and less than a 10% discount rate. In contrast, Scenario 2 is less sensitive to discount rate variation and thus a lower risk and more economically feasible option, albeit less environmentally sustainable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, P., Ahamed, A., Sun, R., De Hoe, G. X., Pitcher, J., Mushing, A., … Shaver, M. P. (2023). Circularizing PET-G Multimaterials: Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 11(42), 15328–15337. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c04047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free