Policies for channel allocation in cognitive radio networks using game theory

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cognitive radio networks evolve according to the actions of selfish users who act independently. The eventual state reached in most of the cases by such a system is a Nash Equilibrium (NE). Multiple NE with different qualities may exist. In this work we consider the problem of allocating channels to multiple transceivers. Based on policies derived from various network metrics we develop a way to initialize the allocation and choose the appropriate channel for each user to push the system towards a higher normalized cumulative total throughput of the CRN. A novel equation to allocate channels is also derived. The improvement is confirmed by our simulation results.

References Powered by Scopus

Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications

10519Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications

4046Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Capacity of fading channels with channel side information

1656Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Design of utility functions for game-based channel allocation in cognitive radio wireless sensor network

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An Analysis on the Impact of Utility Functions on the Performance of Game Theory Based Channel Allocation in Cognitive Radio Wireless Sensor Network

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Channel Allocation Policy for Distributed Wireless Network: Derivation and Analysis of Optimal Interference

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhattarai, A., Charoenlarpnopparut, C., Suksompong, P., & Komolkiti, P. (2016). Policies for channel allocation in cognitive radio networks using game theory. ECTI Transactions on Electrical Engineering, Electronics, and Communications, 14(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.37936/ecti-eec.2016141.171090

Readers over time

‘17‘19‘20‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 4

67%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

71%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

14%

Psychology 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0