Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: Advantages and limitations

132Citations
Citations of this article
128Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Video-recording primary care consultations is an established technique for primary care research. Despite the widespread use of video-recording to help answer a variety of research questions, little is known about how this recording technique influences the findings of studies in which it is employed. Objective. This article investigates how video-recorded consultations have been used in research and discusses how this technique may influence both the internal and external validity of studies. Conclusion. Using video-recorded consultations for research purposes may cause bias in the characteristics of doctors and patients who agree to participate in research. There is little evidence, however, that video-recording influences the behaviour of either GPs or patients. Recommendations are made for researchers who are considering using video-recorded consultations in their research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coleman, T. (2000). Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: Advantages and limitations. Family Practice, 17(5), 422–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/17.5.422

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free