Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic evaluation of two oral formulations of regorafenib: An open-label, randomised, single-dose, two-period, two-way crossover clinical trial in healthy chinese volunteers under fasting and fed conditions

5Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Regorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of solid tumours, but the pharmacokinetic profile of regorafenib in the Chinese population is unclear. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety of two formulations of regorafenib 40 mg in healthy Chinese volunteers under fed and fasting conditions. Methods: A single-centre, randomised, open-label, two-period, two-way crossover phase 1 trial was conducted by randomising a single oral dose of test (T) or reference (R, Stivarga® ) regorafenib (40 mg) to healthy Chinese volunteers under both fasting and fed conditions (high-fat and high-calorie diet). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Adverse events were recorded to assess drug safety. Results: Sixty-six participants were enrolled for both fasting and fed treatments. The 90% CIs geometric least-square means of ratioT/R for regorafenib were completely contained within the equivalence margin of 80–125% under both fasting and fed conditions. Both formulations displayed similar and generally good safety profiles. Conclusion: Single oral dose of the T (40 mg) and R (40 mg) regorafenib was bioequivalent under fasting and fed conditions and had similar favourable safety profiles among healthy Chinese volunteers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Q., Wang, Z., Wu, J., Zhou, Z., Zhou, R., & Hu, W. (2021). Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic evaluation of two oral formulations of regorafenib: An open-label, randomised, single-dose, two-period, two-way crossover clinical trial in healthy chinese volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. Drug Design, Development and Therapy, 15, 3277–3288. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S323169

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free