How Do Unsustainable Practices Remain Dominant? A Practice Theory Reinterpretation of Gramsci

5Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Sociological studies of sustainable transformation have highlighted the relevance of ‘unequal’ and ‘uneven’ transformation dynamics. We argue that a practice-based approach provides far more insight into such unequal dynamics than currently recognized. We re-interpret the political concepts of agonism, antagonism and historic bloc that Gramsci used to analyse domination in order to theorize practice constellations and dynamics that are responsible for the perpetuation of unsustainable practices and the suppression of sustainable ones. Based on empirical findings, we also expand his vocabulary by introducing the concept of synergy. Using the example of urban cycling in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, we propose a Gramscian-inspired account of power and domination in practices as a way of understanding inequality in transformation efforts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scheurenbrand, K., Schatzki, T., Parsons, E., & Patterson, A. (2024). How Do Unsustainable Practices Remain Dominant? A Practice Theory Reinterpretation of Gramsci. Sociology, 58(1), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231178643

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free