We propose some reformulations of binding principle A that build on recent work by Pollard and Xue, and by Runner et al. We then turn to the thorny issue of the status of indices, in connection with the seemingly simpler Principle B. We conclude that the notion of index is fundamentally incoherent, and suggest some possible approaches to eliminating them as theoretical primitives. One possibility is to let logical variables take up the explanatory burden borne by indices, but this turns out to be fraught with difficulties. Another approach, which involves returning to the idea that referentially dependent expressions denote identity functions (as proposed, independently, by Pollard and Sag and by Jacobson) seerms to hold more promise.
CITATION STYLE
Pollard, C. (2005). Remarks on Binding Theory. Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2005.32
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.