MEKANISME LEGISLATIVE REVIEW PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF POLITIK HUKUM

  • Efendi M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the issuance of Constitutional Court decision No. 138/PUU-VII/2009, a legal conflict arises between the Parliament and Constitutional Court, regarding which state institution possess the authority to review any Government Regulation in lieu of Law.  Both institutions declared themselves to be having the sole authority to do just that.  The author, using a juridical normative approach, suggest otherwise. In the auhtor’s opinion, it is the Parliament who should be regarded as having the sole authority. This said taking into consideration that – as soon as the emergency justifung the issuance of the government regulation in lieu of legislation ends – both the government and the parliament shall as soon as possible convene to determine whether this government regulation should be declared null and void or elevated to the status of Law.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Efendi, M. F. (2021). MEKANISME LEGISLATIVE REVIEW PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG DALAM PERSPEKTIF POLITIK HUKUM. Veritas et Justitia, 7(2), 406–430. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v7i2.4215

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

63%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

13%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

13%

Arts and Humanities 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0