Rubric assessment for pharmacotherapy in spiral curriculum: Development and usefulness evaluation

0Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A requirement, which students must satisfy, for a diploma at the Showa University School of Pharmacy is the ability to "plan, practice, and assess pharmacotherapy". To continuously assess the ability of students to meet this requirement and to provide patients with proper pharmacotherapy during student clinical rotations, we formulated the "Rubric assessment for pharmacotherapy"and evaluated its usefulness in tutorial learning classes. Clinical pharmacy faculty members created the rubric based on the Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan (SOAP) note guidelines of the university. Third- (2016) and fourth-year students (2017) were required to self-assess their SOAP notes to analyze six clinical cases using the rubric. The rubric consists of three domains: (1) Evaluation of patient condition, (2) Proposal of pharmacotherapy, and (3) Plan for an assessment of pharmacotherapy. The rubric comprises 31 subdomains and is evaluated according to four levels of performance. In this study, 978 rubric sheets that were used by students to evaluate their own SOAP notes were analyzed. We found that the students were able to continuously self-assess their performance using the rubric while continuously improving their achievement level (p<0.05). The results of this study suggest that rubric assessments may be used as a tool for supporting students to plan, practice, and assess pharmacotherapy.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Handa, S., Kohyama, N., Kurihara, T., Sugiyama, E., Tanaka, S., Yamamoto, H., … Yamamoto, T. (2020). Rubric assessment for pharmacotherapy in spiral curriculum: Development and usefulness evaluation. Yakugaku Zasshi, 140(12), 1441–1454. https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.20-00029

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

29%

Researcher 2

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 2

40%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

20%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

20%

Mathematics 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0