Knowledge brokerage for impact assessment of land use scenarios in inner Mongolia, China: Extending and testing the FoPIA approach

16Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While land serves numerous societal functions and contributes to sustainable development, it is often unclear how these functions are affected by political decisions and common drivers of land use change, such as economic development, climate change and demographic change. This study evaluates alternative land use scenarios in reference to a rural region of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (China), where various processes and decisions have historically triggered unsustainable development. The scientifically tested "Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA)" method is developed further to address specific features of the case study region, and its function as a knowledge-brokerage (KB) tool is evaluated. Three scenarios are developed and analysed in expert workshops. Abstract: While land serves numerous societal functions and contributes to sustainable development, it is often unclear how these functions are affected by political decisions and common drivers of land use change, such as economic development, climate change and demographic change. This study evaluates alternative land use scenarios in reference to a rural region of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (China), where various processes and decisions have historically triggered unsustainable development. The scientifically tested "Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA)" method is developed further to address specific features of the case study region, and its function as a knowledge-brokerage (KB) tool is evaluated. Three scenarios are developed and analysed in expert workshops.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

König, H. J., Podhora, A., Zhen, L., Helming, K., Yan, H., Du, B., … Uthes, S. (2015). Knowledge brokerage for impact assessment of land use scenarios in inner Mongolia, China: Extending and testing the FoPIA approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(5), 5027–5049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7055027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free