OVER THE PAST THIRTY YEARS, ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHERS OF RELIGION HAVE CONFRONTED THE PROBLEM OF EVIL IN THE GUISE OF THE ATHEISTIC ARGUMENT FROM EVIL AGAINST THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. MANY HAVE MET IT FROM THE POSTURE OF DEFENSE, CONSTRUCTING LOGICALLY POSSIBLE MORALLY SUFFICIENT REASONS FOR DIVINE PERMISSION OF EVILS FROM THE MATERIALS OF RELIGION-NEUTRAL VALUE-THEORY. AT BEST, SUCH DEFENSES VINDICATE DIVINE GOODNESS ALONG THE DIMENSION "PRODUCER OF GLOBAL GOODS," WHILE NEGLECTING THE RELIGIOUSLY MORE RELEVANT DIMENSION OF HIS "GOODNESS TO" INDIVIDUAL SUFFERING CREATURES. MY METHODOLOGICAL RECOMMENDATION IS THAT WE CHRISTIAN PHILOSOPHERS SHIFT AWAY FROM DEFENSE AND CONCENTRATE ON FORMULATING WHAT WE REALLY BELIEVE ABOUT THE GOODNESS OF GOD AND HOW HE IS SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF EVIL. (EDITED)
CITATION STYLE
Adams, M. M. (1987). Duns Scotus on the Goodness of God. Faith and Philosophy, 4(4), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil19874445
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.