Local recurrence after stenting for obstructing left-sided colonic cancer

130Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) may be used in acute obstructing left-sided colonic cancers to avoid high-risk emergency surgery. However, oncological safety remains uncertain. This study evaluated the long-term oncological outcome of SEMS as a bridge to elective curative surgery versus emergency resection. Methods A consecutive prospective cohort of patients admitted with obstructing left-sided colonic cancer between 2006 and 2012 was analysed. The decision to stent as a bridge to surgery or to perform emergency surgery was made by the on-call consultant colorectal surgeon in conjunction with a consultant interventional radiologist; when appropriate, they performed the stent procedure together. Primary outcomes were local and distant recurrence, and overall survival. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, proportion of procedures undertaken laparoscopically, and anastomosis and stoma rates. Results In total, 105 patients with obstructing left-sided colonic cancer were treated with curative intent; 62 were treated with SEMS as a bridge to surgery and 43 had emergency resection. In patients aged 75 years or less, stenting and delayed surgery was associated with a higher local recurrence rate compared with emergency surgery at the end of follow-up (32 versus 8 per cent; P = 0·038). This did not translate into a significant difference in overall survival. Conclusion SEMS was associated with an increased local recurrence rate. A note of caution © 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gorissen, K. J., Tuynman, J. B., Fryer, E., Wang, L., Uberoi, R., Jones, O. M., … Lindsey, I. (2013). Local recurrence after stenting for obstructing left-sided colonic cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 100(13), 1805–1809. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9297

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free