International Framework for Examination of the Cervical Region for Potential of Vascular Pathologies of the Neck Prior to Musculoskeletal Intervention: International IFOMPT Cervical Framework

35Citations
Citations of this article
144Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

SYNOPSIS: This position statement, stemming from the International IFOMPT (International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists) Cervical Framework, was developed based upon the best contemporary evidence and expert opinion to assist clinicians during their clinical reasoning process when considering presentations involving the head and neck. Developed through rigorous consensus methods, the International IFOMPT Cervical Framework guides assessment of the cervical spine region for potential vascular pathologies of the neck in advance of planned interventions. Within the cervical spine, events and presentations of vascular pathologies of the neck are rare but are an important consideration as part of patient examination. Vascular pathologies may be recognizable if the appropriate questions are asked during the patient history-taking process, if interpretation of elicited data enables recognition of this potential, and if the physical examination can be adapted to explore any potential vasculogenic hypothesis.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

A modern way to teach and practice manual therapy

8Citations
149Readers

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rushton, A., Carlesso, L. C., Flynn, T., Hing, W. A., Rubinstein, S. M., Vogel, S., & Kerry, R. (2023). International Framework for Examination of the Cervical Region for Potential of Vascular Pathologies of the Neck Prior to Musculoskeletal Intervention: International IFOMPT Cervical Framework. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 53(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2022.11147

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘250255075100

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

68%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

14%

Researcher 7

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 32

48%

Medicine and Dentistry 28

42%

Neuroscience 5

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 123

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0