The paradoxical engagement of contemporary art with activism and protest

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As the contemporary art scene expands outwards with the financial intervention of the corporate sector, the underground cultural activities, experimental communities, and anti-establishment art spaces resist the systematization of the corporate logic. Withwhat has been described as a "social turn of art," we witness a shift in art's engagement with politics, from igniting critical awakening in society to creating communal and egalitarian relations in the public spaces. Hence, the social, political, as well as aesthetic viability of these practices are often questioned. The tension between political activism and artistic representation still persists in the century-old paradox: aestheticization of politics that leads to spectacularization of art to make political ideologies attractive, and politicization of aesthetics that strips art of its autonomy, thus its power to operate as a creative process. Both views place art and politics in two different spheres that intersect and interact in desirable but dysfunctional ways. This article discusses that art is not trapped in the paradox between the aestheticization of politics and politicization of aesthetics; it finds its radical meaning and function in this position.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tunali, T. (2017). The paradoxical engagement of contemporary art with activism and protest. In Rhetoric, Social Value and the Arts: But How Does it Work? (pp. 67–81). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45297-5_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free