Semiquantitative fecal calprotectin test in postinfectious and non-postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome: Cross-sectional study

9Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The presence of a certain degree of inflammation in the gut wall is now accepted in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Fecal calprotectin is considered to be a reliable test for detecting intestinal inflammation. Our aim was to assess the presence of inflammation in postinfectious IBS (PI-IBS), compared with non-postinfectious IBS (NPI-IBS). A secondary objective was to determine the usefulness of a rapid fecal calprotectin test in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a cross-sectional study. Patients with IBS and IBD at a single tertiary gastroenterology center were prospectively included in this study. METHODS: 116 patients with Rome III IBS score (76 females; 48 } 12 years) were investigated; 24 patients (15 females) had PI-IBS. Intestinal inflammation was assessed using the semiquantitative fecal calprotectin test. The results were expressed as T1, T2 or T3 according to the severity of inflammation (< 15 μg/g; 15-60 μg/g; > 60 μg/g). Using the same test, we evaluated 20 patients with IBD (12 males; 47 } 13 years). RESULTS: None of the patients with IBS had a T2 or T3 positive test. Among PI-IBS patients, 33% had a T1 positive test. Among NPI-IBS patients, 9.8% had a T1 positive test, which was significantly different to PI-IBS. The calprotectin test was positive in all IBD patients: 80% with T3, 10% with T2 and 10% with T1. CONCLUSIONS: Using a semiquantitative test for fecal calprotectin, positive tests were more frequent in PI-IBS patients than in NPI-IBS patients

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

David, L. E., Surdea-Blaga, T., & Dumitrascu, D. L. (2015). Semiquantitative fecal calprotectin test in postinfectious and non-postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome: Cross-sectional study. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 133(4), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2014.8000815

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free