The association between statins and cancer incidence in a veterans population

158Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Meta-analyses of trials of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors or statins for cardiovascular disease prevention have failed to show any statistically significant benefit of statins for cancer prevention. However, these trials included relatively young participants, who develop few cancers, and their follow-up periods may have been too short to detect an association between statin use and cancer incidence. We investigated this association in a population of veterans. Methods: We identified patients using antihypertensive medications but no cholesterol-lowering medications (n = 25594) and patients using statins (n = 37248) who were enrolled in the Veterans Affairs New England Healthcare System between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2005. Age- and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for cancer incidence, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer, among patients taking statins compared with patients taking antihypertensive medications and among patients grouped by statin dose (as equivalent simvastatin dose). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The absolute incidence of total cancers was 9.4% among statin users and 13.2% among nonusers (difference = 3.8%, 95% CI = 3.3% to 4.3%, Pdifference

References Powered by Scopus

Cancer statistics, 2007

7688Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farwell, W. R., Scranton, R. E., Lawler, E. V., Lew, R. A., Brophy, M. T., Fiore, L. D., & Gaziano, J. M. (2008). The association between statins and cancer incidence in a veterans population. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 100(2), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djm286

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

58%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

21%

Researcher 9

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 33

65%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

16%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 6

12%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0