Contribution of informal greenspace to bird conservation in cities: a comparative study on the diversity of bird communities in vacant lands, urban parks, and residential areas

5Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Vacant lands are part of the informal greenspace and could maintain native fauna in urban ecosystems. To provide scientific evidence that promotes bird conservation in cities, we compared different bird community attributes among vacant lands, urban parks, and residential areas in the city of Santiago de Chile. For this, we estimated taxonomic diversity in the three land-use types, calculated the species richness and abundance (of total and native species, including three trophic guilds: granivores, insectivores, and omnivores) among land-use types, and evaluated the influence of habitat variables on bird species richness and abundance recorded. We found that vacant lands supported a diverse community, with low species dominance, and high species richness and abundance, comprised mainly by native granivorous and insectivorous birds. In contrast, birds with generalist diet (omnivores) reached high abundances in urban parks and residential areas. While parks and residential areas were dominated by a single omnivore species (Turdus falcklandii in parks and the exotic Passer domesticus in residential areas), a set of native species reached high abundances in vacant lands. These included granivorous birds (Sicalis luteola, Zenaida auriculata, and Zonotrichia capensis) and insectivorous birds (Tachycineta meyeni and Anthus correndera). Sites with a larger cover of herbaceous plants exhibited greater richness and abundance of native birds. In addition, sites with larger proportion of their area covered by bare ground exhibited greater abundance of native birds. Our results demonstrate that vacant lands maintain high bird diversity, as well as a high species richness and abundance of native birds with specialized diets (granivores and insectivores), offering new opportunities to conserve biodiversity in cities.

References Powered by Scopus

Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4

59538Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities

23477Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution

6821Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Can aggregated patterns of urban woody vegetation cover promote greater species diversity, richness and abundance of native birds?

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Opposite Responses of Native and Nonnative Birds to Socioeconomics in a Latin American City

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ACHIEVING BIRD-FRIENDLY CITIES: LESSONS FROM FIVE YEARS OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES IN SAN TIAGO DE CHILE

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Villaseñor, N. R., Luna, A. C., Hernández, H. J., & Escobar, M. A. H. (2021). Contribution of informal greenspace to bird conservation in cities: a comparative study on the diversity of bird communities in vacant lands, urban parks, and residential areas. Ornitologia Neotropical, 32(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.58843/ornneo.v32i2.751

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Researcher 3

43%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

50%

Environmental Science 2

33%

Design 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free