Associations between frequency of tea consumption and health and mortality: Evidence from old Chinese

43Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Tea consumption may be associated with reduced risk of morbidity and mortality; however, this association is not conclusive and has rarely been investigated among very old adults. The present study examines how self-reported frequency of tea consumption in daily life is associated with health and mortality among very old adults in China. The data are from a national longitudinal data set that included 32606 individuals (13429 men and 19177 women) aged 65 years and older: 11807 respondents aged 65 to 84 years and 20799 respondents aged 85 years and older. A total of four measurements between 1998 and 2005 resulted in 51668 observations. Hazard regressions showed that men who drink tea almost every day have a 10-20% lower risk of death compared to their counterparts who seldom drink tea, after adjusting for numerous confounders including baseline health. This relationship was stronger in younger male elders aged 65 to 84 years than in the oldest-old men aged 85 years and older. However, frequency of tea consumption was not significantly associated with mortality in women. Our analyses further show that high frequency of tea consumption is significantly associated with reduced OR of disability in activities of daily living, cognitive impairment, self-rated poor health, cumulative health deficits and CVD in both young elders and the oldest-old, and in both men and women. These results suggest that the health benefit of drinking tea is universal. We conclude that frequent tea consumption probably helps one achieve healthy longevity and that men benefit more from such lifestyles. © 2012 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qiu, L., Sautter, J., & Gu, D. (2012). Associations between frequency of tea consumption and health and mortality: Evidence from old Chinese. British Journal of Nutrition, 108(9), 1686–1697. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114511007173

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free