What Research Evidence Tells Us About Effective Mathematics Teaching for Children aged 6–13

  • Brown M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In examining research on effective teaching it becomes clear that the ideal empirical study should combine iteratively both quantitative and qualitative methods. Small-scale mainly qualitative studies lead to insights which can be tested on a wider scale; patterns in large-scale quantitative data suggest associations which can be explored and better understood by case-studies, and so on. Quantitative studies offer the evidence for evidence-based practice that politicians are now seeking; qualitative analysis can provide the understanding of the processes involved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, M. (2004). What Research Evidence Tells Us About Effective Mathematics Teaching for Children aged 6–13. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 105–107). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9046-9_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free