Dystonia in children and adolescents: A systematic review and a new diagnostic algorithm

57Citations
Citations of this article
180Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Early aetiological diagnosis is of paramount importance for childhood dystonia because some of the possible underlying conditions are treatable. Numerous genetic and non-genetic causes have been reported, and diagnostic workup is often challenging, time consuming and costly. Recently, a paradigm shift has occurred in molecular genetic diagnostics, with next-generation sequencing techniques now allowing us to analyse hundreds of genes simultaneously. To ensure that patients benefit from these new techniques, adaptation of current diagnostic strategies is needed. On the basis of a systematic literature review of dystonia with onset in childhood or adolescence, we propose a novel diagnostic strategy with the aim of helping clinicians determine which patients may benefit by applying these new genetic techniques and which patients first require other investigations. We also provide an up-to-date list of candidate genes for a dystonia gene panel, based on a detailed literature search up to 20 October 2014. While new genetic techniques are certainly not a panacea, possible advantages of our proposed strategy include earlier diagnosis and avoidance of unnecessary investigations. It will therefore shorten the time of uncertainty for patients and their families awaiting a definite diagnosis.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Egmond, M. E., Kuiper, A., Eggink, H., Sinke, R. J., Brouwer, O. F., Verschuuren-Bemelmans, C. C., … De Koning, T. J. (2015). Dystonia in children and adolescents: A systematic review and a new diagnostic algorithm. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 86(7), 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2014-309106

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 61

67%

Researcher 15

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 66

68%

Neuroscience 23

24%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

4%

Psychology 4

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 34

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free