Confirmation test for hysteroscopic sterilization: A descriptive study of patient tolerability and impressions

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: This retrospective descriptive study describes patient follow-up and tolerability of the post-hysteroscopic sterilization confirmation test. Methods: Recruitment for the original sterilization procedure was from January 2008 to March 2009; subsequent confirmation test (hysterosalpingogram) capture was from March 2008 to July 2009. Patients were given a 10 cm visual analog pain scale during the hysteroscopic sterilization procedure, and took the scale with them as a take-home sheet. Following hysterosalpingography (HSG), patients received a follow-up phone call within 24 hours, and were asked to rate their pain during the hysterosalpingogram as well as during the first 2 hours following the test. Results: Eighty-nine hysteroscopic sterilizations were performed under local paracervical block and oral nonsteroidal medication. The median immediate post-sterilization visual analog pain score was 1.9 (range 1.7-2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-1.5). Of the 89 sterilization procedures, 79% (n = 70) patients underwent a confirmation test using HSG. Ten percent (n = 7) of the hysterosalpinograms were performed at least 3 months after sterilization (mean 17 [range 14-20] weeks). Median intratest visual analog pain score overall (n = 70) was 1.8 (range 1.6-1.9, 95% CI 1.5-1.9). Following the test, the median visual analog pain score was 1.7 (range 1.6-1.9, 95% CI 1.4-0.18). Of the 70 patients who participated in visual analog pain score capture, 64 had a paper copy of the scale had six had it via email. Of the 19 who did not complete hysterosalpinography, five were lost to follow-up. Reasons given by the remaining 14 for noncompliance with hysterosalpinography were: a busy schedule/childcare issues (62%), fear of the test (13%), trust in the sterilization procedure alone (13%), and forgetting the appointment (12%). Of the 70 HSGs performed, 69 revealed satisfactory micro insert positions with bilateral occlusion; one was unilaterally patent at 13 weeks post-sterilization, with satisfactory micro insert position. Repeat testing 10 weeks later documented bilateral occlusion. Conclusion: Confirmation testing for hysteroscopic sterilization is well tolerated, with favorable patient impressions after completion. © 2013 Chapa and Venegas, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chapa, H. O., & Venegas, G. (2013). Confirmation test for hysteroscopic sterilization: A descriptive study of patient tolerability and impressions. Patient Preference and Adherence, 7, 269–274. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S41321

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free