Stop PropagHate at SemEval-2019 tasks 5 and 6: Are abusive language classification results reproducible?

5Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper summarizes the participation of Stop PropagHate team at SemEval 2019. Our approach is based on replicating one of the most relevant works on the literature, using word embeddings and LSTM. After circumventing some of the problems of the original code, we found poor results when applying it to the HatEval contest (F1=0.45). We think this is due mainly to inconsistencies in the data of this contest. Finally, for the OffensEval the classifier performed well (F1=0.74), proving to have a better performance for offense detection than for hate speech.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fortuna, P., Soler-Company, J., & Nunes, S. (2019). Stop PropagHate at SemEval-2019 tasks 5 and 6: Are abusive language classification results reproducible? In NAACL HLT 2019 - International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval 2019, Proceedings of the 13th Workshop (pp. 745–752). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/s19-2131

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free