Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?

6Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke has predominantly been with alteplase for over a quarter of a century. In recent years, with trials showing evidence of higher rates of successful reperfusion, similar safety profile and efficacy of tenecteplase (TNK) as compared to alteplase, TNK has now emerged as another potential choice for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. In this review, we will focus on these recent advances, aiming: (1) to provide a brief overview of thrombolysis in stroke; (2) to provide comparisons between alteplase and TNK for clinical, imaging, and safety outcomes; (3) to focus on key subgroups of interest to understand if there is an advantage of using TNK over alteplase or vice-versa, to review available evidence on role of TNK in intra-arterial thrombolysis, as bridging therapy and in mobile stroke units; and (4) to summarize what to expect in the near future from recently completed trials and propose areas for future research on this evolving topic. We present compelling data from several trials regarding the safety and efficacy of TNK in acute ischemic stroke along with completed yet unpublished trials that will help provide insight into these unanswered questions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, N., Menon, B. K., Dmytriw, A. A., Regenhardt, R. W., Hirsch, J. A., & Ganesh, A. (2023, January 1). Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe? Journal of Stroke. Korean Stroke Society. https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2022.02880

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free