Beyond the Global Care Chain: Boundaries, Institutions and Ethics of Care

62Citations
Citations of this article
152Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Revisiting the Global Care Chain literature, we reflect on the ways in which care functions as a moral discourse that simultaneously resonates with local people and helps to promote neoliberalization in contexts that are often left out of the literature. We argue that care, both as concept and practice, inflects the broadest moral contradiction, ambivalence and hybridity of our social and political world today. Critiques of inequalities in global caring, therefore, need to pay attention to the moralization that is part of the neoliberal worldview and the ways in which it meshes with locally meaningful ideas and practices of care.

References Powered by Scopus

The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global

2138Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global care chains: A state-of-the-art review and future directions in care transnationalization research

257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Control by numbers: new managerialism and ranking in higher education

220Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Vietnam’s ‘socialization’ policy and the moral subject in a privatizing economy

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The gendered burden of transnational care-receiving: Sudanese families across The Netherlands, the UK and Sudan

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Giving from the heart: exploring how ethics of care emerges in corporate social responsibility

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nguyen, M. T. N., Zavoretti, R., & Tronto, J. (2017, July 3). Beyond the Global Care Chain: Boundaries, Institutions and Ethics of Care. Ethics and Social Welfare. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2017.1300308

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 70

71%

Researcher 16

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 76

78%

Arts and Humanities 11

11%

Business, Management and Accounting 6

6%

Psychology 5

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0