The diagnostic stability of DSM-IV diagnoses: An examination of major depressive disorder, bipolar I disorder, and schizophrenia in Korean patients

13Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: We examined the stability of diagnoses defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) (major depressive disorder [MDD], bipolar I disorder [BID], and schizophrenia [SPR]) by means of retrospective reviews of medical records. Methods: Data from patients who met the DSM-IV criteria for the aforementioned disorders according to two psychiatrists and who were followed for at least 2 years were included in this study. We reviewed the medical records and compared the diagnosis given at the index admission with assessments made every 6 months for 2 years after discharge to determine diagnostic stability. Results: A total of 138 patients with MDD, 56 patients with BID, and 107 patients with SPR who were followed for 2 years were included in the final analyses. The data showed that 84.8% of the sample retained their initial diagnosis of MDD during the first year; this figure decreased to 79.0% during the second year. During the first year, 93.5% retained their initial diagnosis of BID, and this figure decreased to 89.3% during the second year; 86.8% and 86.9% retained their diagnosis of SPR during the first and second years, respectively. Conclusion: This study showed the instability of three major DSM-IV diagnoses among Korean patients. Additionally, the results demonstrated that accurate diagnosis using the current diagnostic system requires longitudinal observation. Copyright © 2011, Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, W., Woo, Y. S., Chae, J. H., & Bahk, W. M. (2011). The diagnostic stability of DSM-IV diagnoses: An examination of major depressive disorder, bipolar I disorder, and schizophrenia in Korean patients. Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience, 9(3), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.2011.9.3.117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free