Liberal Plebeianism: John Stuart Mill on Democracy, Oligarchy, and Working-Class Mobilization

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

How should democratic societies address inequality in an age of plutocratic encroachment and populist indignation? What role should popular movements play in progressive reform efforts? This article turns to the nineteenth-century liberalism of John Stuart Mill for insights on an essential challenge facing democracy today: how to mobilize social movements against intensifying oligarchic threats while safeguarding liberal-democratic values. I advance a novel reading of Mill as a proponent of liberal plebeianism - that is, as an activist-theorist who confronted the threat of oligarchy by promoting working-class mobilization within a liberal, parliamentary framework. I trace two discourses within Mill's writings and speeches: an antioligarchic discourse focused on countering sinister interests and a mobilization discourse focused on working-class incorporation. Both follow from Mill's conviction that liberal reformers should operate as tribunes of the poor. This reading helps to clarify Mill's contested legacy and provides potential resources for understanding how a plebeian orientation might enliven liberal democracy today.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arlen, G. (2023). Liberal Plebeianism: John Stuart Mill on Democracy, Oligarchy, and Working-Class Mobilization. American Political Science Review, 117(1), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000363

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free