A comparison of digital length estimators for image features

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Image analysis methods for estimating size of object features extract pixel-based measurements, after object segmentation, then convert these to an estimate of actual size; e.g. segmentation of a cell in a randomly located 2-D cross-sectional image, counting no. of pixels on the cell boundary, and converting to an estimate of cell surface area using geometrical formulae. Stereology takes a quite different approach to estimating higher dimensional properties of an object, by using a randomly orientated 2-D specimen section or 2-D projection of a 3-D object. Geometrical properties and sampling theory enable inference of 3-D properties; e.g. feature length is estimated by counting intersections with a randomly superimposed test grid with fixed known spacing. This work compares these two approaches for image feature length estimation, using a simulation study. We generate binary straight line structures and planar curves of known size and compare results from several different estimators of feature length, including a novel estimator which weights pixel count by estimating local curve orientation. © Springer-Verlag 2003.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toh, V., Glasbey, C. A., & Gray, A. J. (2003). A comparison of digital length estimators for image features. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2749, 961–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45103-x_126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free