An experimental study of random knapsack problems

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The size of the Pareto curve for the bicriteria version of the knapsack problem is polynomial on average. This has been shown for various random input distributions. We experimentally investigate the number of Pareto optimal knapsack fillings. Our experiments suggests that the theoretically proven upper bound of O(n3) for uniform instances and O(φμn4) for general probability distributions is not tight. Instead we conjecture an upper bound of O(φμn2) matching a lower bound for adversarial weights. In the second part we study advanced algorithmic techniques for the knapsack problem. We combine several ideas that have been used in theoretical studies to bound the average-case complexity of the knapsack problem. The concepts used are simple and have been known since at least 20 years, but apparently have not been used together. The result is a very competitive code that outperforms the best known implementation Combo by orders of magnitude also for harder random knapsack instances. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beier, R., & Vöcking, B. (2004). An experimental study of random knapsack problems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3221, 616–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30140-0_55

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free